Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/14/2026 of KRISHNA JOSHI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 April 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No. 14 of 2026 Krishna Joshi ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Sujay Gaud and Ms. Sheetal Selwal, Advocates for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 14 of 2026
Krishna Joshi
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Sujay Gaud and Ms. Sheetal Selwal, Advocates for the applicant.
Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.0111 of 2023, under Sections 302, 204, 397, 411 IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.1623 of 2024, was rejected on 11.02.2025. The second bail application, being BA2 No.279 of 2025, was dismissed in non prosecution on 19.03.2026.
4. Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
5. The bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
09.04.2026 Ravi Bisht