Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/469/2026 of KHIM SINGH BORA ALIAS PABAL ALIAS MAITRIY ALIAS PRAKASH ALIAS RAJAN ALIAS VIJAY PAHRU @PRABHAKAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 April 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 469 of 2026 Khim Singh Bora @ Pabal @ Maitriy @ Prakash @ Rajan @ Vijay Pahru @ Prabhakar ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Nipush
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 469 of 2026
Khim Singh Bora @ Pabal @ Maitriy @ Prakash @ Rajan @ Vijay Pahru @ Prabhakar
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Nipush Mola Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No.29 of 2018, arising out of FIR No.3222 of 2007, under Sections 121, 121A, 120B, 124A, 153B IPC, and Section 10/20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 2019, Police Station Nanak Matta, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.
3. It is argued by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail.
4. This fact is not disputed by learned State Counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
2
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
09.04.2026 Ravi Bisht