Uttarakhand High Court

AO/577/2015 of SMT. REETA DEVI Vs DEEPU SINGH RANA on 20 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 20 AO No.577 of 2015 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, Advocate for the respondents.

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

20

AO No.577 of 2015

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the

appellants.

Mr. Siddharth Bisht, Advocate for the

respondents.

Present appeal was dismissed in non

prosecution on 20.03.2026.

Now a Recall/Restoration Application

No.01 of 2026 has been filed on the ground that on the first round of litigation, on that date, learned counsel for the appellant appeared, but in the second round when the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the appellant could not appear.

Having heard, this Court is of the

view that the recall/restoration deserves to be allowed.

The recall/restoration application is

allowed.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

dated 20.03.2026 is recalled. The appeal is restored to its original number. This appeal has already proceeded ex- parte. List on 30.04.2026 for hearing. Heard on Misc Application No. 02 of 2026. This application has been filed by the appellant no. 1 on the ground that the appellant no.2 had already died. The legal heir of appellant no.2 is the appellant no.1 Therefore, the appellant may be permitted to amend the cause title accordingly. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the appellant no.1 is already a legal heir of the appellant no.2, the factum of death of the appellant no.2 be permitted to be recorded against the name of the appellant no.2.

The Misc. Application is allowed. Let necessary amendment be carried out. Amended memo be filed before the date fixed i.e. 30.04.2026.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 09.04.2026 Jitendra

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead