Uttarakhand High Court
SA/112/2017 of Sukhram Vs S.d. Kandwal on 20 March 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SA No.112 of 2017 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ashutosh Posti, Advocate for the respondents. On the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
SA No.112 of 2017
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ashutosh Posti, Advocate for the respondents. On the last date, learned counsel for the appellant has sought time to examine the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(t) of CPC. Today, Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the appellant seeks to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty to file Appeal from Order as per provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(t) of CPC. The instant second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
20.03.2026
Ravi