Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/8/2026 of SACHIN ALIAS GUNDA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 March 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No. 08 of 2026 Sachin Alias Gunda ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 08 of 2026
Sachin Alias Gunda
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No.69 of 2023, State Vs. Sachin @ Gunda, pending in the court of Additional District Judge, Laksar, District Haridwar, arising out of FIR No.496 of 2023, under Sections 323, 342, 307, 504 and 506, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.2806 of 2023, was rejected on 20.05.2024. The second bail application, being BA2 No.313 of 2025, was rejected on 11.12.2025.
4. Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
5. The bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
19.03.2026 Ravi Bisht