Uttarakhand High Court
BA5/3/2025 of HAIDER Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 26 February 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 34 BA5 No. 3 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. None is present for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Learned State counsel
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 34
BA5 No. 3 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
None is present for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Learned State counsel submits that the applicant has already been convicted. The bail application has rendered infructuous. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 26.02.2026
Jitendra