Uttarakhand High Court
HABC/3/2026 of PRIYANKA BAHUGUNA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 25 February 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 28 HABC No. 3 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 28
HABC No. 3 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, D.A.G. for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before an appropriate forum. Permission is accorded. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as above.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.02.2026 Jitendra