Uttarakhand High Court
WPPIL/96/2025 of DEEPAK CHANDRA ADHIKARI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 23 February 2026
e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1173-DB WPPIL No.96 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. None for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Rajni Supyal
SL.
No.
Dat
e
Of f ice Not es,
r epor t s, or ders
or pr oceedin gs
or dir ect ion s
an d Regist r ar’s
or der w it h
Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2026:UHC:1173-DB
WPPIL No.96 of 2025
Hon ’ble Ravin dr a Mait h an i, J.
Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J.
None for the petitioner.
2.
Ms. Rajni Supyal Latwal, learned Brief Holder, for the State/1 and 2.
3.
Mr.
Parikshit
Saini,
learned
counsel
for
the
respondent no.3.
4.
The challenge in the instant writ petition made to the advertisement dated 17.05.2025 and other related reliefs.
5.
Today at the very outset, learned State Counsel submit that the short counter affidavit has been filed, according to which, impugned advertisement has already been cancelled by the State Government on 17.06.2025, and it has also been published in the newspaper.
6.
For two reasons, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(1) Petitioner is absent;
(2) Impugned notification has already been cancelled.
( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) ( Rav in dr a Mait h an i, J.) 2 3 .0 2 .2 0 2 6 Arti/ Nitesh