Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2022/2024 of AAZAD Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 20 February 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 30 BA1 No. 2022 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. At the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 30
BA1 No. 2022 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the police has submitted final report and the bail application has rendered infructuous. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 20.02.2026
Jitendra