Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2089/2025 of KAMLESHWAR DATT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 20 February 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 48 WPSS No. 2089 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Ms. Neetu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.C. Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 48
WPSS No. 2089 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Ms. Neetu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.C. Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner claims parity of pay scale as revised. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has worked as Mistri with the respondent no.4/Irrigation Research Institute, Roorkee, District Haridwar. He is to be paid revised salary. He had worked for a long. He has already retired. She submits that the petitioner had filed a grievance petition before the respondent no.4, but till date no decision has been taken on it. Learned State counsel gives a statement that the grievance petition filed by the petitioner, which is Annexure 11 to the writ petition shall be decided by the respondent no.4 within four weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State counsel. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no.4 to decide the grievance petition of the petitioner (Annexure 11), in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 20.02.2026
Jitendra