Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/149/2026 of SHAMEEM KURESHI ALIAS RENNA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.149 of 2026 Shameem Kureshi @ Renna .... Applicant Vs. State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent Presence:- 1. Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, Advocate for the applicant through V.C. 2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, Learned Brief Holder for the
2026:UHC:1102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.149 of 2026
Shameem Kureshi @ Renna
.... Applicant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent
Presence:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, Advocate for the applicant through V.C.
2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, Learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Dated:19.02.2026
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. (Oral)
By means of the present bail application, the applicant – Shameem Kureshi @ Renna has sought release on bail in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 28 of 2026, registered under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on file.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that it is a case of parity, since co-accused had already been granted bail in First Bail Application No.161 of 2026.
4. Perusal of the FIR and the bail rejection order dated 23.01.2026 would show that there is nothing to
2026:UHC:1102 connect the applicant to the alleged offence as stated in the FIR.
5. Learned State counsel vehemently opposed the bail application, however, he admitted at Bar that the co- accused had already been granted bail and the applicant may be granted bail on the basis of parity.
6. In such view of the matter, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case before the Trial Court, this Court is of the view that the present case is a fit case for grant of bail.
7. The bail application is, accordingly, allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
19.02.2026 Akash
AKASH Digitally signed by AKASH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=dae2472c001d56469ea76fc0caa68f48ef73518c148d140 566ab1e26f9cbe61d, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=27096a1625377537a487dee49224c891823fc6a033 4628b21e516047ed4f22f7, cn=AKASH Date: 2026.02.20 10:50:07 +05'30'