Uttarakhand High Court
HABC/22/2022 of VIKAS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 February 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS HABC No.22 of 2022 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. None is present for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
HABC No.22 of 2022
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
None is present for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Instant writ petition is defected. None is present for the petitioner. In fact, on the last occasion also, none appeared for the petitioner.
4. It is habeas corpus petition filed by the husband seeking corpus of his daughter and wife.
5. Learned State counsel submits that, in fact, the wife of the petitioner is staying in a parental house; she does not want to stay with the petitioner. She is there in her parental house along with her daughter.
6. As per office report, there is a defect of court fees. Since none is present for the petitioner, under these facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is dismissed.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.)
09.02.2026 Akash