Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/272/2026 of INDERJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 6 February 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.272 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Mani Kumar (through V.C.) and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.272 of 2026
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Mani Kumar (through V.C.) and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned A.A.G. and Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought to quash the impugned FIR bearing FIR No.21 of 2026, under Sections 323, 406, 420 & 504 of IPC, 1860, P.S. Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar (Annexure No.1).
4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the offences in the FIR punishable up to seven years and thus the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another, (2014) 8 SCC 273.
5. On a query made to the learned Additional Advocate General, he does not deny the said position.
6. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).
7. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.
[
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
Vacation Judge
06.02.2026
Ravi