Uttarakhand High Court

C528/140/2026 of CHANDAN SINGH GINWAL Vs BANSHI LAL SAH on 4 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C528 No.140 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Pratul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

C528 No.140 of 2026

Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Mr. Pratul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel through video conferencing appearing for the respondent.

3. The present application under Section 528 of BNSS seeks setting aside of the judgment and order dated 12.07.2019 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Haldwani, District Nainital in Criminal Case No.44 of 2014, Banshi Lal Sah vs. Chandan Singh Ginwal, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

4. When the matter was taken up yesterday, the respondent-Mr. Banshi Lal Sah was present in person had made the statement before this Court that he has received the amount and he does not want to pursue the matter any further.

5. The counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajeev Khandelwal vs. State of Maharashtra and another, 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 1103.

6. In that view of the matter, the compounding application which is duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant and the respondent, is liable to be allowed in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties which is Annexure-2 to the affidavit.

7. The judgment and order dated 12.07.2019 is hereby set aside.

8. The applicant who is in jail be forthwith released, if he is not required in any other case.

9. The compounding application (IA No.2 of 2026) and the criminal miscellaneous application are disposed of accordingly.

[

(Siddhartha Sah, J.)

Vacation Judge

04.02.2026

Ravi

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead