Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/244/2026 of AASMA ALIAS AASMA ANURADHA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 3 February 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ] WPCRL/244/2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. 1. Mr. Mehboob Rahi, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal and Mr.
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
]
WPCRL/244/2026
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mehboob Rahi, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal and Mr. Deepak Bharadwaj, Brief Holder for the State.
3. Urgency application is allowed.
4. Petitioners have sought quashing of the FIR No. 0075 of 2026, dated 23.01.2026, registered under Sections 316(2), 351(2) and 352 of BNS, 2023, registered at PS Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar.
5. Counsel for the State-respondents states that since the imprisonment for the offences is less than upto 7 years, the case is squarely covered by the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
6. In view of the submissions as advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, the present Writ Petition is disposed of in view of the Judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar,
(2014) 8 SCC 273 and the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure as prescribed under Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C.
7. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
Vacation Judge
03.02.2026 Kaushal