Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/153/2026 of SAHIL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 3 February 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/153/2026 Hon’ble Sidhartha Sah, J. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant through V.C. 2. Mr. Devendra Rana,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/153/2026 Hon’ble Sidhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant through V.C.
2. Mr. Devendra Rana, learned AGA assisted by Mr. Vikas Uniyal, Brief Holder for the State
3. Applicant- Sahil, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.131 of 2025, dated 27.04.2025, under Sections 310(2), 311, 317(3) and 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, PS Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. The bail has been sought on the ground of parity in view of the order dated 5th January, 2026, passed by learned Coordinate Bench of this Court in First Bail Application No. 2201 of 2025, Harendra alias Bittu vs. State of Uttarakhand.
6. On the query, learned State counsel does not dispute that the role of the applicant is any different from Harendra alias Bittu.
7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period. Therefore, at this stage, on the ground of parity, bail application of the applicant is allowed.
8. Accordingly, let the applicant be enlarged on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
Vacation Judge
03.02.2026 Kaushal