Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/225/2026 of MEENA DEVI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 2 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.225 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. 2. Mr. Sudheer

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPCRL No.225 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing.

2. Mr. Sudheer Kumar Nailwal, B.H. for the State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file statutory appeal under Section 6 of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970.

4. Permission so sought is granted.

5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

(Siddhartha Sah, J.) Vacation Judge 02.02.2026 SK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead