Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/262/2026 of SHIVAM PANWAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 2 February 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.262 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. 2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.262 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi and Mr. Suyash Pant, S.C.s’ for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at bar that he does not want to press for prayer no.1.
4. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed insofar as prayer no. 1 is concerned.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to prayer no. 2 of the writ petition.
6. With the consent of learned counsel for the State, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents-Competent Authority to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.01.2026, annexure no. 4 to the writ petition, by a speaking and reasoned order within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.) Vacation Judge 02.02.2026 SK