Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2379/2025 of VINOD KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 January 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 2379 of 2025 Vinod Kumar ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Hon’ble
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 2379 of 2025
Vinod Kumar
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Vinod Kumar is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 474 of 2023, under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC, Police Station Bajpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail.
4. This fact is not disputed by learned State Counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
10.01.2026 Avneet/