Uttarakhand High Court
SPA/244/2024 of RENU RAUTELA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 January 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SPA No.244 of 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
SPA No.244 of 2024
Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i J. Hon ’ble Siddh ar t h a Sah , J.
Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent nos.1 to 3.
3. Mr. Gaurav Kandpal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.4.
4. The writ petition filed by the appellant, seeking relaxation in upper age limit, was dismissed in limine by learned Single Judge vide judgment dated 26.07.2024. The said judgment is under challenge in this intra- court appeal.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that learned Single Judge has decided similar issue in Writ Petition (S/ S) No.494 of 2024 and other connected petitions.
6. Learned State Counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for the selecting body, however, submit that appellant cannot get benefit of the said judgment, as the selection process has completed long back and any interference with the selection process at this belated stage will derail the entire process.
7. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the documents submitted by the appellant were verified in 2024. He submits that the appellant had participated in the selection, pursuant to interim order passed by the Division Bench in this appeal.
8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Special Appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to make representation to the competent authority seeking age relaxation. If petitioner makes such representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken within three weeks thereafter.
9. Till decision on appellant’s representation, one post of Nursing Officer (Female) shall be kept reserved.
[
( Siddh ar t h a Sah , J.) ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i J.) 10.01.2026 BS/ Akash