Uttarakhand High Court

ABA/1290/2025 of MANISH KAUSHAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 3 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1290 of 2025 Manish Kaushal ..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Amar Murti Shukla and Mr. Rohit Kumar Gaur, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1290 of 2025

Manish Kaushal

..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Amar Murti Shukla and Mr. Rohit Kumar Gaur, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Special Sessions Trial No. 01 of 2025 in connection with Case Crime No.213 of 2022, under Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC and Section 3 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 2005, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that co-accused having similar role has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court.

4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be

2 granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed.

6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever.

(ii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court concerned.

(iii) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the court concerned. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the court concerned.

(iv) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on

(i) & (ii) above.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.)

03.01.2026 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df 4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450 A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2026.01.06 10:58:39 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead