Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2534/2025 of HAMMAD ALI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 2 January 2026
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 2534 of 2025 Hammad Ali …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 2534 of 2025 Hammad Ali
…..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant Hammad Ali is in judicial custody in FIR No. 85 of 2024, under Sections 8/21/22/29/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Prem Nagar, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is argued that the main accused, from whom recovery was done, has already been granted bail; applicant was named by the co-accused, from whose possession narcotic substance was recovered.
4. These factual narrations are not disputed by the learned State Counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
2
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
02.01.2026 Avneet/