Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/3661/2025 of MOHD ALIM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 60 WPMS No. 3661 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 60
WPMS No. 3661 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the respondent no.3. The challenge in this petition is made to the recovery certificate dated 22.10.2020 with regard to the electricity charges. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that the appeal is provided under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file an appeal. He also submits that for a week, the respondent no.3 may not make any recovery. To it, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that for a week, the proceedings of recovery shall not be initiated. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 31.12.2025
Jitendra