Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/3708/2025 of HARDEEP SINGH Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR on 31 December 2025

OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.3648 of 2025 Sukhvindar Kaur and others ..........Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .......….Respondents Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3648 of 2025

Sukhvindar Kaur and others

..........Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

.......….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3655 of 2025

Kailashi

........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another ….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3687 of 2025

Jit Singh Negi

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3688 of 2025

Hayat Singh

............Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Page 1 of 10

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3689 of 2025

Pratap Singh Panwar

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3692 of 2025

Ram Singh

..........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3693 of 2025

Rakesh Singh

Page 2 of 10

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3694 of 2025

Smt. Bhagwati Devi

...........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3697 of 2025

Bhupendra Singh

.............Petitioner Versus

District Magistrate and another

......….Respondents

Page 3 of 10

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3698 of 2025

Shiv Singh

................Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3699 of 2025

Khim Singh

...........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3700 of 2025

Gajram Singh

............Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3701 of 2025

Bhopal Singh

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Page 4 of 10

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3703 of 2025

Babu Ram

..........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3704 of 2025

Kuldeep Singh

.........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3705 of 2025

Kirti Singh

Page 5 of 10

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3706 of 2025

Ram Prasad

........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Page 6 of 10

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3707 of 2025

Baldev Singh

...........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3708 of 2025

Hardeep Singh

..........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3709 of 2025

Smt. Rama Devi

............Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3710 of 2025

Mahaveer

............Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Page 7 of 10

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3711 of 2025

Veerpal Singh

............Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3712 of 2025

Tarsem Singh

...........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3713 of 2025

Smt. Prema Devi alias Prem Devi

.........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3714 of 2025

Manjeet Singh Rawat

............Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Page 8 of 10

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3725 of 2025

Baljit Singh

...........Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another .….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

Since common question of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are heard together and decided by this common judgment.

2. The petitioners seek direction to the respondents to get their names mutated over the ceiling land.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that identical controversy has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025, in WPMS No. 3367 of 2025, Anup Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and connected petitions and the petitioners in those petitions have been directed to make separate application to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact.

6. Since the identical issue has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025 in the case of Anup Singh (supra), all these

Page 9 of 10

petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in the case of Anup Singh (supra).

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are given liberty to make separate application(s) to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, for correcting of the provision invoked for allotting land to them. If such representation(s) is made within two weeks from today, District Magistrate shall examine the matter and pass appropriate order, within eight weeks thereafter. Stake holders, if any, shall also be heard while taking any decision in the matters.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.)

31.12.2025 Avneet/

Page 10 of 10

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead