Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/237/2025 of DEEPAK KUMAR Vs PRADEEP MEHROTRA on 30 December 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 37 CLCON No. 237 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the respondent.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 37
CLCON No. 237 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the respondent. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order, of which non-compliance is report, has been complied with. Since the order, of which non- compliance is report, has been complied with, nothing survives in the contempt petition. The contempt petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.) 30.12.2025 Avneet/