Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/3677/2025 of INDERJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 30 December 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.3600 of 2025 Harman Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3600 of 2025
Harman Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3674 of 2025
Gurvindar Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3675 of 2025
Surjeet Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3676 of 2025
Santosh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.
And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3677 of 2025
Inderjeet Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.
And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3679 of 2025
Kamaljeet Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)
Since common question of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are heard together and decided by this common judgment.
2. The petitioners seek direction to the respondents to get their names mutated over the ceiling land.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that identical controversy has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025, in
WPMS No. 3367 of 2025, Anup Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and connected petitions and the petitioners in those petitions have been directed to make separate application to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact.
6. Since the identical issue has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025 in the case of Anup Singh (supra), all these petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in the case of Anup Singh (supra).
7. Accordingly, the petitioners are given liberty to make separate application(s) to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, for correcting of the provision invoked for allotting land to them. If such representation(s) is made within two weeks from today, District Magistrate shall examine the matter and pass appropriate order, within eight weeks thereafter. Stake holders, if any, shall also be heard while taking any decision in the matters.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
30.12.2025 Avneet/