Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2298/2025 of NEELU THAPLIYAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 30 December 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 16 WPSS No. 2298of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 16
WPSS No. 2298of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the State. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been working as Assistant Teacher (Primary) in Swami Ramtirth Girls High School, Rajpur, Dehradun. She is qualified now. She claims regularization. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical issues have already been decided by this Court by order dated 24.12.2025 in WPSS No. 2264 of 2025, Sulochna Upadhyay Vs. State of Uttarakhand by giving liberty to the petitioner in that case to make fresh representation to the competent authority to consider her case. He submits that the matter is squarely covered. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the respondents. Since the identical issue has already been decided, the petition is decided in terms of the order dated 24.12.2025, passed in the case of Sulochna Upadhyay (supra). Accordingly, the petitioner is given liberty to make fresh representation to the competent authority, within two weeks from today. If the petitioner makes such representation within the stipulated time, the same shall be decided, as per law, within four months thereafter.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 30.12.2025
Jitendra