Uttarakhand High Court
FA/96/2021 of SHARAD SHARMA Vs POOJA SHARMA on 30 December 2025
e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:11659-DB FA No.96 of 2021 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2025:UHC:11659-DB
FA No.96 of 2021 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The instant appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the court of learned Judge Family Court, Haridwar in Original Case No.299 of 2017 Sharad Sharma vs. Pooja Sharma, by which the petition for divorce filed by the appellant has been rejected.
4. Heard.
5. Today, learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent – Pooja Sharma has passed away. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Since the respondent has died, nothing survives in this appeal.
6. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 30.12.2025 Nitesh/Akash