Precedent

Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/3652/2025 of AMRIK SINGH Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE on 29 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.3628 of 2025 Karnail Singh ...Petitioner Versus District Magistrate and another ….Respondents Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3630 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3628 of 2025

Karnail Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3630 of 2025

Jogendra Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3635 of 2025

Lal Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3636 of 2025

Kulvinder Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3637 of 2025

Sukhvindar Kaur and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3638 of 2025

Nishan Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3639 of 2025

Paramjeet Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3640 of 2025

Manjeet Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3641 of 2025

Amar Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3644 of 2025

Karanpal Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3645 of 2025

Bhoori and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3646 of 2025

Gurmeet Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3647 of 2025

Jagdish Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3649 of 2025

Satnam Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3650 of 2025

Charan Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3651 of 2025

Chandrapal Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And

Writ Petition (M/S) No.3652 of 2025

Amrik Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3654 of 2025

Pratap Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3656 of 2025

Chandra Sain

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3657 of 2025

Balveer Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3658 of 2025

Sukhvinder Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3659 of 2025

Jogendra Singh and others

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3660 of 2025

Balveer Kaur and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3663 of 2025

Harvinder Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3664 of 2025

Preetam Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3665 of 2025

Sahabjot Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3666 of 2025

Balvindar Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

District Magistrate and another

….Respondents

Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

Since common question of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are heard together and decided by this common judgment.

2. The petitioners seek direction to the respondents to get their names mutated over the ceiling land.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that identical controversy has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025, in WPMS No. 3367 of 2025, Anup Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and connected petitions and the petitioners in those petitions have been directed to make separate application to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact.

6. Since the identical issue has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025 in the case of Anup Singh (supra), all these petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in the case of Anup Singh (supra).

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are given liberty to make separate application(s) to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, for correcting of the provision invoked for allotting land to them. If such representation(s) is made within two weeks from today, District Magistrate shall examine the matter and pass appropriate order, within eight weeks thereafter. Stake holders, if any, shall also be heard while taking any decision in the matters.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.)

29.12.2025 Jitendra

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead