Uttarakhand High Court

AO/358/2022 of NEELAM AGARWAL Vs ANIL KUMAR AGARWAL on 24 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 15 AO No. 358 of 2022 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ayush

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 15

AO No. 358 of 2022 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ayush Agarwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Akhil Kumar Sah, Advocate for the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that instant appeal has rendered infructuous. It stands disposed of accordingly.

(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.)

24.12.2025 Jitendra

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead