Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2455/2025 of IKRAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 December 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 2455 of 2025 Ikrar ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 2455 of 2025
Ikrar
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No.162 of 2021, State of Uttarakhand Vs. Aas Mohammad and Others, pending in the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Laksar, District Haridwar, arising out of FIR No.422 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail.
4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.
2
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
19.12.2025 Ravi Bisht