Uttarakhand High Court
BA2/298/2025 of JAVED Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 December 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Bail Application No. 298 of 2025 Javed ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No. 298 of 2025
Javed
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing.
Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.422 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.
3. This is the second bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.653 of 2023, was rejected on 27.09.2023; the role of the applicant is not dissimilar.
4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail.
5. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.
2
6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
19.12.2025 Ravi Bisht