Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/39/2025 of MAHAK SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 December 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No.39 of 2025 Mahak Singh ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No.39 of 2025 Mahak Singh
….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.475 of 2022, dated 25.06.2022, under Sections 376, 376(d), 376(d)(b), 363, 366, 366-A and 34 IPC and Sections 5(g)(m)/6 and 16/17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. It is third bail application of the applicant. His first and second bail applications have already been rejected on 21.02.2024 and 27.08.2024 respectively.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the third bail application of the applicant deserves to be rejected.
4. The third bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
19.12.2025 Sanjay