Uttarakhand High Court

C482/879/2021 of SURJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 32 C-482 No. 879 of 2021 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 32

C-482 No. 879 of 2021 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the respondent no. 2. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is accorded. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ravindra Maithani J.)

19.12.2025 Avneet/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead