Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/51/2025 of TANJEEL ALI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 12 December 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS S1- 01 Correction Application, MCRC No.2 of 2025 In BA3 No.51 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS S1- 01
Correction Application, MCRC No.2 of 2025 In BA3 No.51 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Maulakhi, D.A.G. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Applicant was granted bail on 12.12.2025 in Case Crime No.401 of 2021, under Sections 302, 201, 392, 411 IPC, Police Station Ramnagar, District Nainital. Now, Correction Application, MCRC No.2 of 2025, has been filed. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is custody under Sections 120-B and 34 IPC also, but these Sections could not be recorded in the bail application. Hence, it could not be reflected in the Court’s order dated 12.12.2025. He seeks amendment also. The Correction Application is allowed, accordingly. Let the applicant file an amended memo of the application. Once it is done, the correction be carried out, today itself.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
18.12.2025 RV