Uttarakhand High Court
BA2/311/2025 of SHISHUPAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 December 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Bail Application No. 311 of 2025 Shishupal ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No. 311 of 2025
Shishupal
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No.22 of 2023, State Vs. Shishupal, arising out of FIR No.396 of 2022, under Sections 302, 304-B IPC and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.
3. This is the second bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.482 of 2024, was rejected on 09.05.2024.
4. Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
2
5. The bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
11.12.2025 Ravi Bisht