Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/78/2025 of FAIZAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 December 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No. 78 of 2025 Faizal ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Pritish Arya, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 78 of 2025
Faizal
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Pritish Arya, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.111 of 2022, under Sections 363, 366, 506 and 120-B IPC and Section 16/17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.
3. This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.2517 of 2022, was rejected on 11.04.2023. The second bail application, being BA2 No.297 of 2025, was also rejected on 20.11.2025.
4. Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
2
5. The bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
11.12.2025 Ravi Bisht