Uttarakhand High Court
HABC/35/2025 of NEHA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 December 2025
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Habeas Corpus Petition No. 35 of 2025 Neha ….......Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others …..... Respondents Present : Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Brief Holder for
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Habeas Corpus Petition No. 35 of 2025
Neha
….......Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
…..... Respondents
Present : Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Virk, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos.1 to
3.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Coram:
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
On behalf of the petitioner Neha, her husband Shahban alias Chhotu had filed present petition so as to produce Ms. Neha, the petitioner from the illegal custody and confinement of the respondent no.4, her father.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, in fact, the petitioner was confined by the respondent no.4, Imran illegally; the petitioner Neha is legally wedded wife of Shahban alias Chhotu, through which, the petition has been filed. Therefore, the petitioner had sought her release from the custody of her father.
4. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that after filing of the petition, police has intervened and now, the petitioner Neha is with her husband and they are present in the Court.
2
5. Both, Neha and Shahban alias Chhotu, as identified by their counsel are present before the Court. They have submitted that they both have living together and they are major.
6. In view of what is stated by the petitioner Neha and Shahban alias Chhotu, nothing survives in this petition. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.)
09.12.2025
09.12.2025 Sanjay
SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df 4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450 A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.12.10 15:27:22 +05'30'