Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/3353/2025 of MADARSA ASHARFUL ULUM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 4 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3353 of 2025 (M/S) Madarsa Asharful Ulum ….......Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others …..... Respondents Present : Mr. Ahrar Baig, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1, 2,

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 3353 of 2025 (M/S)

Madarsa Asharful Ulum

….......Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others …..... Respondents Present : Mr. Ahrar Baig, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- “i. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or directions to the Respondents no.6 to immediately de-seal the Petitioner’s Madarsa/Maktab and restore its operations. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents from stopping Deeni Tamil of petitioner. iii. Issue an appropriate writ, order or directions declare the sealing of the Madarsa/Maktab as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional. iv. Issue any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. v. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset submits that the controversy has already been decided by this Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and connected cases on 26.08.2025.

4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.

5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 26.08.2025, passed in Writ Petition

2 (M/S) No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and connected cases.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.)

04.12.2025 Sanjay

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead