Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/287/2023 of URBA DUTT RIKHARI Vs SACHIN KURVEY SECRETARY REVENUE on 28 November 2025
Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/49 CLCON No.287 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Kaushal Sah Jagati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or d ir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/49
CLCON No.287 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Kaushal Sah Jagati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for respondents. The petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court that order dated 19.10.2022, passed in WPSS No. 2009 of 2022, Urba Dutt Rikhari Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others has been wilfully disobeyed by the respondents, by which, the Court had given liberty to the petitioner to make a representation claiming regularization to Competent Authority and, thereafter, the Competent Authority was directed to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner. Learned State Counsel gives a statement that the representation of the petitioner has already been decided on 31.10.2025. The Court takes on record the Written Instructions, as received by the learned State Counsel which is tendered for perusal of the Court. In view of the statement given by the learned State Counsel, nothing survives in this petition. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.11.2025 Sanjay