Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/70/2025 of INTZAAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 28 November 2025
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No. 70 of 2025 Intzaar …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Avneesh Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 70 of 2025 Intzaar
…..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Avneesh Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Pawan Kumar Nath, Advocate for the informant.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant Intzaar is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No. 162 of 2021, State of Uttarakhand v. Aas Mohammad and others, pending in the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Laksar, District Haridwar, which is based on Case Crime No. 422 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. This is third bail application of the applicant. His first and second bail applications have already been rejected on 23.09.2022 and 09.12.2024.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
4. It is argued that co-accused Javed and Irshad both have been granted bail and the applicant has the similar case because the applicant is in custody for a long similar to the co-accused Javed and Irshad, who have been granted bail.
2
5. Learned State Counsel admits this factual narration.
6. Having considered the period of incarceration of the applicant and other attending factors, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not approach the injured, the family members of the deceased either personally or through any of his relatives or through any other mode.
(ii) The applicant shall not make any post on social media platform or electronically at any other place with regard to the incident or this case.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
28.11.2025 Avneet/