Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2080/2025 of SHOKAT ALI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 28 November 2025
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 2080 of 2025 Shokat Ali …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. A.S. Rawat, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Girveer Chand, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 2080 of 2025 Shokat Ali
…..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. A.S. Rawat, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Girveer Chand, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Pawan Kumar Nath, Advocate for the informant.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant Shokat Ali is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No. 162 of 2021, State of Uttarakhand v. Aas Mohammad and others, pending in the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Laksar, District Haridwar, which is based on Case Crime No. 422 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is argued that co-accused Javed and Irshad both have been granted bail and the co-accused Intzaar, Julfukar @ Chhota, Imran and Aas Mohammad have also been granted bail by the orders passed today on 28.11.2025; the applicant has the similar case because the applicant is in custody for a long similar to the co-accused Javed, Irshad, Intzaar, Julfukar @ Chhota, Imran and Aas Mohammad, who have been granted bail.
2
4. Learned State Counsel admits this factual narration.
5. Having considered the period of incarceration of the applicant and other attending factors, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not approach the injured, the family members of the deceased either personally or through any of his relatives or through any other mode.
(ii) The applicant shall not make any post on social media platform or electronically at any other place with regard to the incident or this case.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
28.11.2025 Avneet/