Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/485/2024 of LOHIT SINGH Vs PANKAJ PANDEY on 27 November 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 55 CLCON No. 485 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 55
CLCON No. 485 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the respondent no.2. The petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court that the order 06.06.2024, passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 893 of 2024, Lohit Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another (“the petition”) has been willfully disobeyed by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that they have made recommendation for selection of the petitioner in view of the Court’s order dated 06.06.2024 passed in the petition. Learned State counsel submits that post recommendation received from the respondent no.2, the petitioner had already been given appointment. Since the order of Court has been complied with, nothing survives in this contempt petition. It is closed.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.11.2025
Jitendra