Uttarakhand High Court
FA/207/2019 of RAJEDNRA SINGH CHAUHAN Vs MEENA CHAUHAN on 25 November 2025
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No. 207 of 2019 Rajendra Singh Chauhan ......Appellant Versus Meena Chauhan ..….Respondent Present: Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the respondent. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Appeal No. 207 of 2019
Rajendra Singh Chauhan
......Appellant
Versus
Meena Chauhan
..….Respondent
Present:
Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the respondent.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Instant appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 15.10.2019, passed in Original Suit No. 190 of 2017, Sri Rajendra Singh Chauhan Vs. Smt. Meena Chauhan, by the court of Additional Judge, Additional Family Court, Dehradun. By which, the petition seeking divorce filed by the appellant under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (“the Act”) has been dismissed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. On the last occasion, after interacting with the parties, it appeared that the parties may arrive at a settlement. Today, a compromise application has been filed jointly by the parties. The compromise application is taken on record.
2
4. The appellant Rajendra Singh Chauhan is present in person before this Court identified by his counsel Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate and the respondent Ms. Meena Chauhan, is also present in person before this Court identified by her counsel Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate. They have accepted and verified the compromise that has been filed in the Court.
5. It is accepted and verified by the parties that the marriage between the parties stood dissolved and the respondent has taken Rs.35 Lakh as permanent alimony.
6. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that the appeal may be decided in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties.
7. The appeal is decided in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. The compromise shall form a part of this order.
(Alok Mahra J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.11.2025
25.11.2025
Jitendra