Uttarakhand High Court

C24/2/2024 of JYOTI Vs BRIJPAL SINGH VERMA on 7 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Transfer Application No. 2 of 2024 Smt. Jyoti ….....Applicant Versus Brijpal Singh Verma ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.P. Bahuguna, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble Ravindra

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Civil Transfer Application No. 2 of 2024

Smt. Jyoti

….....Applicant

Versus

Brijpal Singh Verma

….….Respondent

Present:- Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.P. Bahuguna, Advocate for the respondent.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

By means of the instant application, the applicant seeks transfer of Original Suit No. 224 of 2023, Shri Brijpal Singh Verma v. Smt. Jyoti, (“the case”) pending in the court of Additional Family Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh, District Dehradun.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The applicant is the wife of the respondent. Both the applicant and the respondents were married on 06.06.2010. Thereafter, dispute arose in the relationship. The case has been for divorce by the respondent. The applicant seeks transfer of the case from the court of Additional Family Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh, District Dehradun to the court of Judge, Family Court, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is the resident of Jaspur; it may be inconvenient to her to travel to Rishikesh to attend the proceedings of the case; therefore, the case may be transferred to the court of Judge, Family Court, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2

5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection to it. He submits that the respondent is critically ill and, therefore, the court may be directed to decide the case, as expeditiously as possible.

6. Having considered, the transfer application is allowed.

7. The Original Suit No. 224 of 2023, Shri Brijpal Singh Verma v. Smt. Jyoti, is transferred from the court of Additional Family Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh, District Dehradun to the court of Judge, Family Court, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

8. The Court requests the Judge, Family Court, Kashipur to decide the case, as expeditiously as possible keeping in view the illness of the respondent. It may be noted that during the course of argument, today, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent is suffering from cancer. (Ravindra Maithani, J)

07.11.2025 Avneet/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead