Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2085/2025 of AFZAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 6 November 2025
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2085 of 2025 Afzal ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.2085 of 2025
Afzal
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Criminal Case No. 112 of 2025, in FIR No.910 of 2024, under Section 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3, 5, 11 of the Uttrakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is argued that co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.
4. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
2
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 06.11.2025 Jitendra