Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/534/2019 of PARTAP SINGH PAPTA Vs UNION OF INDIA on 4 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 29 WPSB No. 534 of 2019 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mayank Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Atul Bahuguna,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 29

WPSB No. 534 of 2019 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Mayank Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Atul Bahuguna, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 04.11.2025

Jitendra

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead