Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2033/2025 of MANOJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 October 2025
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2033 of 2025 Manoj Kumar …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.2033 of 2025 Manoj Kumar
…..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.101 of 2020, dated 30.01.2020, under Sections 307, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station Roorkee, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.
4. This fact is not denied by learned State Counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
2
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
31.10.2025 Sanjay