Uttarakhand High Court
ABA/1172/2025 of BASIR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 30 October 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 32 ABA No. 1172 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 32
ABA No. 1172 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Applicants Basir and Galib seek anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No. 78 of 2025, under Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. It is argued that co-accused have already been granted bail. Learned State counsel submits that the applicant Basir and Galib are not wanted at all. The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned State counsel. In view of the statement given by learned State Counsel, nothing survives in this anticipatory bail application. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 30.10.2025
Jitendra