Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/900/2025 of MS PRAMOD KUMAR GOVT CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL ORDER SUPPLIER Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 28 October 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D2- 23 WPMB No.900 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D2- 23
WPMB No.900 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Additional C.S.C. for the State. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent nos.2 and 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous because the grievance has already been redressed. The writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infrucuous.
(Alok Mahra J.) (Ravindra Maithani J.)
28.10.2025 RV